An analysis of Manchester United’s current form suggests that the belief the team would significantly improve following Scott McTominay’s sale to Napoli has largely proven to be a myth.
The departure of Scott McTominay to Napoli was initially framed by some as a necessary step in Manchester United’s tactical evolution.
However, recent analysis suggests the “improvement myth” surrounding his exit is beginning to unravel. While the club sought a more technical midfield profile, they have struggled to replicate McTominay’s unique ability to provide late goals and physical presence.
Critics argue that the team has lost a “clutch” performer without gaining the promised control.
Data indicates that United’s midfield balance remains precarious under Ruben Amorim, despite the arrival of new profiles.
The article highlights that while McTominay was often criticized for his limited ball progression, his defensive work rate and box-to-box energy are proving difficult to replace.
As the team continues to drop points in the Premier League, the narrative that United are better off without him is being increasingly questioned by analysts and supporters alike.
The transition to a more possession-based style has yet to yield consistent results, leading to internal debates about the wisdom of the summer sale.
One prevailing sentiment suggests that the “McTominay myth” was built on a desire for a different style of football that the current squad is not yet equipped to play.
As one expert observed, “The club traded a reliable, albeit limited, physical presence for a vision of technical superiority that hasn’t materialized on the pitch.”