World Cup - Qualification Europe
FYR Macedonia
Goal
Goal (Assist: M. Damsgaard)
Goal
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Yellow Card
Substitution
Goal (Assist: C. Eriksen)
Substitution
Substitution
Substitution
Yellow Card
Substitution
Substitution
Denmark 4-2-3-1 Brian Riemer
16
5
3
15
18
23
21
14
12
8
9
Starters
- 16 M. Hermansen
- 5 J. Maehle
- 3 V. Nelsson
- 15 C. Norgaard
- 18 A. Bah
- 23 P. Hojbjerg
- 21 M. Hjulmand
- 14 M. Damsgaard
- 12 V. Froholdt
- 8 G. Isaksen
- 9 R. Hojlund
Substitutes
- 1 A. Jungdal
- 2 O. Provstgaard
4 L. Hogsberg- 6 N. Nartey
- 7 M. Jensen
10 C. Eriksen- 11 W. Osula
13 J. Lindstrom- 17 K. Hogh
- 19 N. Nartey
- 20 A. Dreyer
- 22 F. Ronnow
FYR Macedonia 4-2-3-1 Blagoja Milevski
23
3
6
5
8
7
21
11
10
17
15
Starters
- 23 S. Dimitrievski
- 3 S. Herrera
- 6 V. Musliu
- 5 G. Zajkov
- 8 A. Stojcevski
- 7 E. Elmas
- 21 J. Atanasov
- 11 D. Churlinov
- 10 E. Bardhi
- 17 L. Qamili
- 15 E. Rastoder
Substitutes
- 1 D. Iliev
- 2 E. Bejtulai
4 N. Serafimov
9 A. Trajkovski- 12 D. Siskovski
- 13 D. Musovski
14 D. Velkovski- 16 B. Nikolov
- 18 L. Doriev
19 M. Ristovski- 20 B. Miovski
22 I. Alimi
Loading chat...
Match Statistics
-
9 Shots on Goal 0
-
5 Shots off Goal 2
-
20 Total Shots 3
-
6 Blocked Shots 1
-
10 Shots insidebox 1
-
10 Shots outsidebox 2
-
10 Fouls 8
-
11 Corner Kicks 2
-
2 Offsides 0
-
68% Ball Possession 32%
-
0 Yellow Cards 2
-
0 Red Cards 0
-
0 Goalkeeper Saves 5
-
589 Total passes 283
-
523 Passes accurate 211
-
89% Passes % 75%
-
0 expected_goals 0
-
0 goals_prevented 0
Head-to-Head Stats
Recent Matches
- 2026-03-26 Denmark 4 - 0 FYR Macedonia
Recent Form
Related News
-
2026-27 Nations League draw revealed as England, Wales discover daunting League A opponents
England have been placed in a challenging 2026-27 Nations League group alongside Spain, Croatia, and Czechia, marking Thomas Tuchel’s first major tournament cycle since extending his contract. England’s return to the top tier of the Nations League will feature a high-stakes reunion with Spain, the team that denied them glory in the Euro 2024 final. Following their promotion under Lee Carsley, the Three Lions were placed in League A Group 3, where they will also contend with recurring rivals Croatia and a resilient Czechia side. This daunting draw coincides with the confirmation that Thomas Tuchel has extended his managerial deal until 2028, ensuring he will lead the squad through this competitive cycle following the 2026 World Cup. The tournament structure also presents a difficult task for Wales, who must navigate a group containing title-holders Portugal, Norway, and Denmark. Meanwhile, Scotland will face Switzerland and Slovenia in League B, while Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland prepare for tests against Hungary and Austria respectively. Fixtures are scheduled to commence in late September 2026, utilizing a revised international window format. Regarding the challenging path ahead, FA sources indicated that the schedule provides “belated revenge” opportunities as England seeks to re-establish dominance among Europe’s elite. -
World Cup 2026: The giants and minnows in each group
The 2026 FIFA World Cup draw established 12 groups for the record 48-team tournament hosted by the U.S., Mexico, and Canada, highlighting debuts for minnows like Curaçao and confirming defending champions Argentina’s path in Group J.
The groups for the 2026 FIFA World Cup have been finalized following the draw ceremony held at the Kennedy Centre in Washington on Friday, according to a report from Malta Today.
The expanded tournament will feature a record 48 teams competing in 104 games across 16 host cities in Canada, Mexico, and the United States, beginning in Mexico City on June 11 and concluding with the final in New York, New Jersey on July 19.
The draw placed 42 already-qualified teams into 12 groups, reserving slots for the six remaining teams to be decided in the March play-offs.
The field will include several World Cup debutants, most notably Cape Verde, Jordan, Uzbekistan, and Curaçao, with the Caribbean island nation of Curaçao becoming the smallest country by population size to ever qualify.
All 11 of the world’s top-ranked teams have secured their places, but major footballing nation Italy is among the 22 countries left to compete in the play-offs for the final six berths, including four from the UEFA play-offs.
The groups pit giants against minnows in several intriguing matchups. Group C features Brazil alongside Morocco, Scotland, and Haiti, while Group E sees Germany matched with Ivory Coast, Ecuador, and Curaçao. Group H includes Spain, Saudi Arabia, Uruguay, and Cape Verde.
Defending champions Argentina, led by captain Lionel Messi, were drawn into Group J alongside Algeria, Austria, and Jordan.
Messi is seeking to guide his nation to become the first team to win consecutive tournaments since Brazil did so in 1958 and 1962.
Messi, who already holds the record for 26 World Cup games played, is also just three goals shy of Miroslav Klose’s career World Cup goals record.
Host nation USA is set to compete in Group D against Paraguay and Australia.
Attendance across the 16 venues is projected to exceed the record 3.59 million set when the US last hosted the tournament in 1994.
-
Spain and France handed tough World Cup draws
The 2026 World Cup draw has produced challenging groups, with Spain facing Uruguay and France set to play Norway and Senegal. Co-hosts Mexico will kick off the tournament against South Africa, while the United States and Canada also learned their group stage opponents.
Reigning champions Argentina begin their title defence against Algeria. Elsewhere, England will have a chance for revenge against Croatia in a repeat of their 2018 semi-final clash. The Three Lions are also grouped with Ghana and Panama in Group L.
-
Scotland face Brazil and Morocco in World Cup
Scotland has been drawn in Group C for the 2026 World Cup, facing Brazil, Morocco, and Haiti. The draw is a direct repeat of their group from the 1998 tournament. Steve Clarke’s side will begin their campaign against Haiti on June 13th in the United States.
Midfielder Ryan Christie insists the team is determined to advance, stating, “We’re not just there to make up the numbers. We’re wanting to go and compete and get through the group phase.” Playoff paths were also determined for Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland.
-
FIFA World Cup 2026 draw pots explained ahead of group draw
The 2026 FIFA World Cup draw is set for December 5th in Washington D.C. With an expanded 48 teams, the process is more complex.
According to a report from Firstpost, the draw for the 2026 FIFA World Cup will divide 48 teams into four pots — with hosts fixed in Pot 1 — and then assign one team from each pot into 12 groups, subject to seeding and confederation constraints.
The final draw for the 2026 World Cup will take place on December 5 2025 at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C.
Under the format, the 48 qualified teams (plus placeholders for play-off winners) are organized into four seed “pots” of 12 each. Pot 1 includes the three co-hosts — United States, Canada and Mexico — plus the nine highest-ranked qualified teams, based on the November 2025 FIFA Men’s World Ranking.
Pots 2, 3 and 4 are filled by the remaining qualified teams, ordered by ranking; teams still to qualify (via European or inter-confederation playoffs) are allocated to Pot 4.
When the draw is conducted, one team from each pot will be placed into each of the 12 groups (Groups A through L) — ensuring each group has four teams.
The three host nations already have predetermined group positions: Mexico will occupy Group A1, Canada Group B1, and the United States Group D1.
To preserve geographical and competitive balance, teams from the same confederation will generally not be drawn into the same group — with one major exception: for the European confederation (UEFA), each group may contain one or two European teams (given the number of European-qualified teams).
Another new feature for 2026: to avoid early knockout-stage clashes between the strongest teams, the four highest-ranked non-hosts — Spain national football team, Argentina national football team, France national football team and England national football team — will be placed into separate “paths” in the knockout bracket.
This means that if all win their groups, they cannot meet each other until the semifinals (or the final, depending on bracket alignment).
Because six qualifying spots remain undecided at draw time (from playoff rounds to be held in March 2026), the draw will include placeholders — but the final pot allocation for those teams is already set (Pot 4).
Overall, this draw structure — four pots, confederation-based restrictions, fixed host slots and knockout-path separation for top teams — aims to ensure balanced groups and minimize the chance that multiple elite teams eliminate each other early.
1. Match Summary
Denmark convincingly defeated FYR Macedonia 4-0 in a dominant performance. The match was largely one-sided, with Denmark controlling possession and creating numerous scoring opportunities. Mikkel Damsgaard opened the scoring in the 49th minute, followed by a quickfire double from Gustav Isaksen in the 58th and 59th minutes. Christian Nørgaard added a fourth in the 75th minute to seal the victory. The game saw a flurry of substitutions in the second half, particularly from FYR Macedonia, as they attempted to change the game's dynamic.
2. Team Performance Analysis
Denmark: Denmark were thoroughly impressive, showcasing a commanding performance in all areas of the pitch. Their 68% ball possession and 89% pass accuracy demonstrate their control of the game. The statistics highlight their attacking prowess with 20 total shots and 9 on target, resulting in 4 goals. Defensively, they were solid, not allowing FYR Macedonia a single shot on goal. The team's ability to create chances and convert them was exceptional, with assists playing a key role in the goals.
FYR Macedonia: FYR Macedonia struggled to compete with Denmark's intensity and quality. Their 32% possession and 75% pass accuracy indicate they were largely playing catch-up. The lack of attacking threat is starkly illustrated by their 0 shots on goal from just 3 total shots. They were consistently under pressure, as evidenced by the 11 corner kicks conceded and the 5 saves made by their goalkeeper. The multiple substitutions made in the second half suggest a desperate attempt to find a foothold in the game, but ultimately proved ineffective.